[omnia]

Max_Priest's abv post wif his misconceived rebuttal contains nothing but flawed logic & assumptions...particularly wif all those sweeping grand statements of his that lack any foundation...

"Omnia is making an unsound sweeping statement without valid grounds ..."

"The fallacy of the above fella's argument is deductively unvalid and he is merely making a hasty generalization without sufficiently solid ground ... "

"However, juz to set the record straight ... If the above fella has doubt in the credibility of all my FRs, and if he thought my FRs are all tainted with bias facts ... I would suggest he points up which part of all my FRs posted over the years were bias instead of merely making an unsound sweeping statement per se without valid & strong grounds to back his atrocious and rather immature campiagn here ... "

FACT: i said IMPUTED BIAS + CONFLICT OF INTEREST....it is v clear that Max_Priest has no clue what these 2 terms mean...

IMPUTED BIAS has already arisen in Max_Priest's case when he admitted that the GL WLs whom he writes about in SBF(via his frs) actually know about his SBF persona...becuz this wld put Max_Priest in a situation of personal emotional interest whenever he posts his frs on the GL WLs in SBF...

I shall deal wif the other more sinister factor which also constitutes IMPUTED BIAS in Max_Priest's case, i.e. his non-monetary interest of receiving or trying to receive non-monetary benefits fm the GL WLs in return for writing frs on them in SBF, in due course...

CONFLICT OF INTEREST has also already risen in Max_Priest's case for the same reason as abv i.e. personal emotional interest which cld possibly taint the credibility of his frs in SBF on the GL WLs who actually know about his SBF persona...

Also same as abv, I shall deal wif that other more sinister factor which also constitues CONFLICT OF INTEREST in Max_Priest's case in due course...

I suggest that fella Max_Priest go look up the meaning of those 2 terms...and...once he understands their true meanings...then perhaps he may wish to cum back wif a proper cogent logical rebuttal, if he can that is...

Which leads me on to Max_Priest's deafening silence viz his earlier admission that the GL WLs actually know about his SBF persona...so unlike of him not to rebut/reply/comment on this critical fact....but...just remain dead silent instead...why did the cat get yr tongue on this one, Max_Priest?!...

Oh yes and when Max_Priest said...

"In fact I really can't be bothered when samsters or that above Omnia fella are skeptical about the credibility of my FRs as I am not paid to post FR"

once again he has shown that he has no clue where i am cumming fm...same old misconceived flawed logic n assumptions by Max_Priest...

FACT: I hv never claimed that Max_Priest has been paid to post FR...what i said n shall continue to elaborate on in due course is whether Max_Priest's only true agenda is to just purely support the WLs without receiving or trying to receive benefits in return fm the WLs...

the key word/term here being BENEFITS...a word/term Max_Priest appears not to fully understand...

fyi Max_Priest, BENEFITS r not only just restricted to monetary/financial gain...in yr case BENEFITS r linked to you receiving or trying to receive RAW SEX fm the GL WLs whom you write about in SBF via yr frs, i.e. non-monetary benefits...

For those who r interested...stay tuned to find out more on whether Max_Priest's only true agenda is to just purely support the WLs without receiving or trying to receive benefits in return fm the WLs...