In response,
Both agents have contacted me to clarify the situation, however to make things clear:
SevenStar-
Claims the Cindy is indeed the girl I received. The facial features of the girl I saw resembles to a large extent. But the scar on the stomach isn't seen on the picture. Perhaps the lingerie is covering the scar. However, I was skeptical and asked the girl her age. Cindy said she was 25, while the post says 27. So in response she says she preferred to specify 27 instead of 25 to the agent. Not gonna buy that BS though.
Lets say the girl sent to me was indeed Cindy, and I was charged 250$ for 27yr old M'sian Chinese who claims to be 27 when she is in real only 25. Looked cute and petite albeit she was as good as a dead fish on the bed. The fake moaning or wailing was non-stop irrespective of me touching her or not. Lots of this cannot that cannot. I was also told that she was working as Lynn with SGBabes in the past. Anyways, lets give the benefit of doubt to 7Stars, but without ruling out the fact that this girl is also working elsewhere (other than for QA for once perhaps) under a different name or not. I did not reject the girl and proceeded as agreed. There is no question of me asking for a refund here.
My only concern at the time of starting this thread >> Is this girl really Cindy as advertised or not. The girl i met has a scar below her navel + and strange distorted looking 3 tipped triangular spear of some sort on her right hand.
QueensAffection-
Contacts me to inform that the girl sent to me is indeed Lydia and mentions that the scar on the tummy is not captured by the photographer due to some reason and so on. I don't believe this one bit but I leave it at that.
The people who are affected due to this unnecessary saga are the other girls working under these agents and to some extent the agents themselves. The real girls are here for a reason and so there is no point pursuing this.
Another point to note is the fact that this part timer girl is not carrying a valid work permit in Singapore, nor is she a PR. Her entry into Singapore is solely for visiting which means she is not entitled to work here. Now this is dangerous for all parties involved. In case there is a AV raid the customer will also be in trouble. So why are agents entertaining such a situation.? Correct me if am wrong here.
Secondly, this girl is here to earn money, and so is everyone else out there, nothing wrong with that. However for this girl, getting rejected by a client is no big deal, as long as the $50 has been received. That is exactly how I was treated and I felt the agent let this happen, hence my long post. I was distastefully told to pay $50 even though she understood that she is in the wrong. Whether the agent (QA) has a hand in this is another matter.
PS: I am not interested in getting back any rejection fees nor the refund. Lets just say the agents here get honest going forward :roll eyes:
Good luck to all the Samsters out there…
Be good.