The Asian Commercial Sex Scene

The Asian Commercial Sex Scene (https://samleong.life/index.php)
-   The Legal Geylang (prostitute) Scene (https://samleong.life/forumdisplay.php?f=2)
-   -   Girls in 1654A (https://samleong.life/showthread.php?t=216060)

BronzeGod 24-05-2015 06:22 PM

Re: It was an Electrifying Sexxion!
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by max_priest (Post 13079775)
...... Well, I am aware u are trying to promote the WLs from M13 due to the obvious ... No issue to me if you love to do that ... As mentioned and do remember, your words or mine can only affect the WLs to a minute extent as majority of customers are not samsters :D ... I believe your effort would be much more appreciative to samsters if you stop behaving like a sadist ...

Whether my FR is truthful or not, I believe discerning punters would know after trying her ... And the queue for her speaks for itself ... Your comment on this is redundant ...

I agree with you that the queue speaks for itself.

I also somewhat agree with your comment on "your words or mine can only affect the WLs to a minute extent as majority of customers are not samsters"

Which is precisely why when you said the below...

Quote:

Originally Posted by max_priest (Post 13079034)

I hope I don't have to wait extra long for her after the above FR ... :rolleyes:

Enjoy,
MaXx

My immediate response was this statement here...

Quote:

Originally Posted by BronzeGod (Post 13079152)
Doubt there'll be much diff even with the Fr.

So you see, my point is your FR will not make the queue longer, which matches your point on "your words or mine can only affect the WLs to a minute extent as majority of customers are not samsters"

----

however I disagree on your point about "Well, I am aware u are trying to promote the WLs from M13 due to the obvious ..."

Nope sorry, I am not trying to promote girls from any particular house. So can't allow such an unfounded accusation to stand, bro. I've always been an advocate of moving around the over 40 PRC Cat 150 houses in geylang.

cheers.

max_priest 24-05-2015 06:38 PM

Re: It was an Electrifying Sexxion!
 
Dude, I in fact have nothing against u currently but constructive and objective comment is highly appreciated, as far as I am concern ... I really appreciate a handful of samsters who consistently provide objective comments in this forum ...

Quote:

Originally Posted by BronzeGod (Post 13079899)
I agree with you that the queue speaks for itself.

I also somewhat agree with your comment on "your words or mine can only affect the WLs to a minute extent as majority of customers are not samsters"

however I disagree on your point about "Well, I am aware u are trying to promote the WLs from M13 due to the obvious ..."

Nope sorry, I am not trying to promote girls from any particular house. So can't allow such an unfounded accusation to stand, bro. I've always been an advocate of moving around the over 40 PRC Cat 150 houses in geylang.

cheers.


max_priest 24-05-2015 06:40 PM

Re: Girls in 1654A
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Islands (Post 13079694)
Tried Coco few days back. Quick FR.
Look: 7/10, 50% look like Liu Yufei
Body: 8/10. smooth and fair skin, tall (1.68m) with zero extra fats.
Boobs: 6/10; B- with pinky nipples. But cannot allow to suck for too long, a bit turn off by it.
Pussy: normal.
Cat bath/bbbj: 6.5/10. Normal 54A SOP, nothing to shout about.
FJ: 6/10, did a quickly as I was a bit turn off by her not allowing me to suck longer on her pinky nipples. Thus, missionary all the way and release, never try other position.
GFE: 7/10; able to chat, not bad in this area.
RTF: may be, she is pretty, may be I will try her again after exploring other newbies, may be can break the ice next try, who's know! 8P!

Thanks for the truthful FR, bro ... :)

korean 24-05-2015 06:43 PM

Re: Girls in 1654A
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by baotohk (Post 13079813)
Queen Lulu is hard to beat ...she excel in face , body and services. How to find these days?

Nana equivalent will be Coco but Nana edge ahead with looks

thx for the reply bro! Excel in every departments is not realistic, priotize the preferences is more duable. Even lulu has her weakness...looks like no need to rush down to take a look then...

max_priest 24-05-2015 06:49 PM

Re: Girls in 1654A
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by korean (Post 13079982)
thx for the reply bro! Excel in every departments is not realistic, priotize the preferences is more duable. Even lulu has her weakness....

That's a fair comment, bro ...

To me Nana or Lulu is not the prettiest I have seen in GL150 ... If you have seen the pioneer or second batch of PRC, these former two are nothing ... LuLu and NAna has the charm and assets plus service ... Lookwise, lose up at least two notches to the cream of the pioneer or second batch of PRC ... Those Snr players who tried the pioneer batch for sure would agree with my take ... Cheers!

BronzeGod 24-05-2015 06:53 PM

Re: It was an Electrifying Sexxion!
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by max_priest (Post 13079951)
Dude, I in fact have nothing against u currently but constructive and objective comment is highly appreciated, as far as I am concern ... I really appreciate a handful of samsters who consistently provide objective comments in this forum ...

well. let us continue to do so and appreciate you and others' hard work to provide FRs here.

but perhaps you may want to be less reactive when people make any kind of comment following your FRs? I think we are all just trying to share our views here. no one samster is a master of all knowledge - we each contribute our own views and hopefully that gives samsters reading this forum more information and choices, since there really are a lot of choices with some 45 cat 150 PRC houses in geylang right?

cheers.

korean 24-05-2015 07:01 PM

Re: Girls in 1654A
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by max_priest (Post 13079993)
That's a fair comment, bro ...

To me Nana or Lulu is not the prettiest I have seen in GL150 ... If you have seen the pioneer or second batch of PRC, these former two are nothing ... LuLu and NAna has the charm and assets plus service ... Lookwise, lose up at least two notches to the cream of the pioneer or second batch of PRC ... Those Snr players who tried the pioneer batch for sure would agree with my take ... Cheers!

I totally agree with you on above. I've seen the earlier batch (not pioneer batch) so I know what u mean. Actually even from current pool there are prettier WLs than lulu (nana just barely considered pretty)...

max_priest 24-05-2015 07:59 PM

Re: It was an Electrifying Sexxion!
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by BronzeGod (Post 13079996)
well. let us continue to do so and appreciate you and others' hard work to provide FRs here.

but perhaps you may want to be less reactive when people make any kind of comment following your FRs? I think we are all just trying to share our views here. no one samster is a master of all knowledge - we each contribute our own views and hopefully that gives samsters reading this forum more information and choices, since there really are a lot of choices with some 45 cat 150 PRC houses in geylang right?

cheers.

I am not being reactive ... There are bunch of samsters disagreed with my FR ... I don't really bother ... It is entirely up to them if they disagree or do not believe what I have experienced. However, for your case, I perceived what you have written as being a sadist ... I have already stressed to u above why I thought so earlier ...

If you are sincere and truthful in your comments, you would not have made that comment - "she looks not bad but nothing outstanding" considering that u have not even fucked her. How would u know? Hearsay??! ... And u went on to persuade the rest to "patronize" M13 WLs indirectly and using the comments - "to explore other shops" as a guise of being neutral ... That is at least my personal perspective on you ... Not sure about others ...

BronzeGod 24-05-2015 08:22 PM

Re: It was an Electrifying Sexxion!
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by max_priest (Post 13080213)
I am not being reactive ... There are bunch of samsters disagreed with my FR ... I don't really bother ... It is entirely up to them if they disagree or do not believe what I have experienced. However, for your case, I perceived what you have written as being a sadist ... I have already stressed to u above why I thought so earlier ...

If you are sincere and truthful in your comments, you would not have made that comment - "she looks not bad but nothing outstanding" considering that u have not even fucked her. How would u know? Hearsay??! ... And u went on to persuade the rest to "patronize" M13 WLs indirectly and using the comments - "to explore other shops" as a guise of being neutral ... That is at least my personal perspective on you ... Not sure about others ...

Why can't I say "she looks not bad but nothing outstanding"? I'm talking about her looks and nothing else. How is that "untruthful"?

Nope. once again, your insinuation about my intent with regard m13 is unfounded.

I do find the girls there currently interesting, but there have been many houses I have commented about in the past. I find 24m13 girls interesting now to me.

So I'm not allowed to mention that I like 24m13? And by mentioning that, is anything wrong?

Nato17 24-05-2015 08:34 PM

Re: It was an Electrifying Sexxion!
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by BronzeGod (Post 13080282)
Why can't I say "she looks not bad but nothing outstanding"? I'm talking about her looks and nothing else. How is that "untruthful"?

Nope. once again, your insinuation about my intent with regard m13 is unfounded.

I do find the girls there currently interesting, but there have been many houses I have commented about in the past. I find 24m13 girls interesting now to me.

So I'm not allowed to mention that I like 24m13? And by mentioning that, is anything wrong?

It can be quite easily found that some one definitely has a case of DSM-5, especially since "So I'm not allowed to mention blah blah blah...." Notice that this person has a grandiosity, feelings of entitlement; self centeredness? I don't really need to point out much but I think some people should really examine their pathetic lives really.

baotohk 24-05-2015 09:19 PM

Re: It was an Electrifying Sexxion!
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Nato17 (Post 13080310)
It can be quite easily found that some one definitely has a case of DSM-5, especially since "So I'm not allowed to mention blah blah blah...." Notice that this person has a grandiosity, feelings of entitlement; self centeredness? I don't really need to point out much but I think some people should really examine their pathetic lives really.

Nato, you are impressive. Being a OKT and yet possess medical knowledge!!

Nato17 24-05-2015 09:22 PM

Re: It was an Electrifying Sexxion!
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by baotohk (Post 13080458)
Nato, you are impressive. Being a OKT and yet possess medical knowledge!!

It is not medical knowledge lei. It is psychology 101 lei.

Besides I only primary 3 education only....

unfit 24-05-2015 09:35 PM

Re: Girls in 1654A
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by baotohk (Post 13080458)
Nato, you are impressive. Being a OKT and yet possess medical knowledge!!

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nato17 (Post 13080468)
It is not medical knowledge lei. It is psychology 101 lei.

Besides I only primary 3 education only....

Ha Ha Ha...not bad huh:D

Mouth Big Brain Small aka MBBS Geylang also here:p

joker88 24-05-2015 09:39 PM

Re: Girls in 1654A
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Nato17 (Post 13065281)
Not L69H69 because I would not sabo any other OKT lor. But don't know why all the other OKTs sabo L69H69 lor. :p

Becos you always take away their biz mah. :rolleyes:

So they jealous of you lor. :)

joker88 24-05-2015 10:31 PM

Re: It was an Electrifying Sexxion!
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by max_priest (Post 13080213)
......If you are sincere and truthful in your comments, you would not have made that comment - "she looks not bad but nothing outstanding" considering that u have not even fucked her. How would u know? Hearsay??! ... And u went on to persuade the rest to "patronize" M13 WLs indirectly and using the comments - "to explore other shops" as a guise of being neutral ... That is at least my personal perspective on you ... Not sure about others ...

Quote:

Originally Posted by BronzeGod (Post 13080282)
................. Nope. once again, your insinuation about my intent with regard m13 is unfounded.
.......................
So I'm not allowed to mention that I like 24m13? And by mentioning that, is anything wrong?

Bro MP & BG

Allow me to say a few words. Maybe it is not important to you.

Promoting the 24M13 gals and promoting the 24M13 house are two different things. :rolleyes:

You do not need to bonk the 24M13 gals inside their house.
You can call them from another house. No need to go there. ;)

The rooms in 24M13 are really in quite poor conditions and I for once would not bonk their gals inside those rooms. :(
Their rooms are the worst in GL after L18H54. L18H54 rooms are the worst in GL.

So there is really no necessity to persuade bros to explore 24M13 instead.
They can try the gals at other houses.

As for the 24M13 gals, there is also no need to promote them becos bros will know whether they are good or not after some time.

Just my 2 cents' worth. No hidden agenda.

I am only stating the facts and my personal opinion. :)


All times are GMT +8. The time now is 10:48 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copywrong © Samuel Leong 2006 ~ 2025