The Asian Commercial Sex Scene

The Asian Commercial Sex Scene (https://samleong.life/index.php)
-   The Legal Geylang (prostitute) Scene (https://samleong.life/forumdisplay.php?f=2)
-   -   Girls in 1654A (https://samleong.life/showthread.php?t=216060)

max_priest 04-03-2016 03:42 PM

Re: Girls in 1654A
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by triggered4head (Post 14289017)
Guess I am a lucky punter today... Wanted to try cat150 for the first time, read so many FRs still dunno who to choose, decided to go see for myself... Before entering the chiobu smoking outside already caught my eye, so after go in pretty much straightaway chose her... Turns out she's xiao xin... Service wise probably not considered commando, even though I never try commando before, I'm just a newbie here 4th time to geylang, basically not mind blowing even for newbie like me... But still left a happy man because looks are most impt for me...

Hi triggered4head ... Thanks for your truthful FR ... Try other WLs if you can and enjoy!

Look forward to see more FR from you ... ;)

P/S: I hope the usual handful samsters above to tone down on their TCSS so that the rest can benefit from the relevant comments and FR on WL. if you guys wanna TCSS irrelevant stuff, pls do so in the GL TCSS threads in the stickies as well as in the sub thread - "Hottest News in GL Daily & Gossips" specially created ... courtesy of Sammyboyfor & Honestkieth respectively.

Cheers,
MaXx

korean 04-03-2016 05:15 PM

Re: Girls in 1654A
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by max_priest (Post 14292783)

P/S: I hope the usual handful samsters above to tone down on their TCSS so that the rest can benefit from the relevant comments and FR on WL. if you guys wanna TCSS irrelevant stuff, pls do so in the GL TCSS threads in the stickies as well as in the sub thread - "Hottest News in GL Daily & Gossips" specially created ... courtesy of Sammyboyfor & Honestkieth respectively.

Cheers,
MaXx

OKT meng called u up to help him moderate his thread? :rolleyes:

cyberkoh88 04-03-2016 05:17 PM

Re: Girls in 1654A
 
wrong thread

baotohk 04-03-2016 06:48 PM

Re: Girls in 1654A
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by korean (Post 14293169)
okt meng called u up to help him moderate his thread? :rolleyes:

You are funny!!

korean 04-03-2016 07:23 PM

Re: Girls in 1654A
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by baotohk (Post 14293490)
You are funny!!

did I soudn funny? :p

unfit 04-03-2016 07:46 PM

Re: Girls in 1654A
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by korean (Post 14292303)

Nice huh...limited edition :p

unfit 04-03-2016 07:49 PM

Re: Girls in 1654A
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by korean (Post 14293169)
OKT meng called u up to help him moderate his thread? :rolleyes:

Then Ah Meng got to pay Advertising Fee to Sammy Boss or the thread will be gone :eek:

korean 04-03-2016 07:55 PM

Re: Girls in 1654A
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by unfit (Post 14293743)
Then Ah Meng got to pay Advertising Fee to Sammy Boss or the thread will be gone :eek:

so the boss must thank me for tat? :rolleyes:

max_priest 04-03-2016 08:40 PM

Re: Girls in 1654A
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by korean (Post 14293169)
OKT meng called u up to help him moderate his thread? :rolleyes:

This is not a OKT Meng's or whoever thread. This thread is created for like-minded genuine punters to converge in order to share and contribute intels on WLs ... If you guys TCSS irrelevant stuff incessantly, it defeats the purpose of such thread. This also apply to other threads like L1809, L2033, L1606, etc. and not just L1654A.

I know you no longer patronize GL WL due to reason you know yourself and hence you have nothing much to contribute these days but please spare a thought for others. I am expecting a somewhat Snr Samster like yourself to be considerate and sensible ... you should not wait till I voice that up ... You should be setting a good example to newbie samsters. Obviously no one is keen in your irrelevant stuff and especially who you KC in GL in the past. Agree?

There are plenty of threads created for u to TCSS which I have already named some ... :rolleyes:

max_priest 04-03-2016 08:46 PM

Re: Girls in 1654A
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by korean (Post 14293772)
so the boss must thank me for tat? :rolleyes:

I have been in existence long enough and know the code of conduct very well in SBF. If not, I believe my online persona has been assassinated long ago by my enemies ... I am sure you know who were my past enemies ... Just look at what have happened to them ... Either they are in moderation, MiA or being kicked out by the owner of this forum. :D

max_priest 04-03-2016 08:48 PM

Re: Girls in 1654A
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by unfit (Post 14293743)
Then Ah Meng got to pay Advertising Fee to Sammy Boss or the thread will be gone :eek:

Let see what u said will happen ... U wanna have a little bet with me? If that really will happen, the first to go will be thread L1820 and L1805 due to the obvious ...

korean 04-03-2016 09:02 PM

Re: Girls in 1654A
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by max_priest (Post 14293989)
I have been in existence long enough and know the code of conduct very well in SBF. If not, I believe my online persona has been assassinated long ago by my enemies ... I am sure you know who were my past enemies ... Just look at what have happened to them ... Either they are in moderation, MiA or being kicked out by the owner of this forum. :D

Yeah I know who is ur enemy, but I'm not affraid to be another one here. Anyway here is just for me to tcss now whenever something interested me. I dont see anyone voice out except u, especially on certain threads only? why huh? :rolleyes:

korean 04-03-2016 09:04 PM

Re: Girls in 1654A
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by max_priest (Post 14293949)
This is not a OKT Meng's or whoever thread. This thread is created for like-minded genuine punters to converge in order to share and contribute intels on WLs ... If you guys TCSS irrelevant stuff incessantly, it defeats the purpose of such thread. This also apply to other threads like L1809, L2033, L1606, etc. and not just L1654A.

I know you no longer patronize GL WL due to reason you know yourself and hence you have nothing much to contribute these days but please spare a thought for others. I am expecting a somewhat Snr Samster like yourself to be considerate and sensible ... you should not wait till I voice that up ... You should be setting a good example to newbie samsters. Obviously no one is keen in your irrelevant stuff and especially who you KC in GL in the past. Agree?

There are plenty of threads created for u to TCSS which I have already named some ... :rolleyes:


I tot some bro here enjoy tcss in ad hoc mode. I'm not just talking to myself, am I? And I didn't talk abt KC now here? GO and read properly

max_priest 04-03-2016 09:06 PM

Re: Girls in 1654A
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by korean (Post 14294071)
Yeah I know who is ur enemy, but I'm not affraid to be another one here. Anyway here is just for me to tcss now whenever something interested me. I dont see anyone voice out except u, especially on certain threads only? why huh? :rolleyes:

You should know very well that all the threads on all GL shops are created with the objective of making life better for like-minded and genuine punters to share and pick up intels. Obviously u are not one now and you are being selfish for your action.

korean 04-03-2016 09:14 PM

Re: Girls in 1654A
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by max_priest (Post 14294083)
You should know very well that all the threads on all GL shops are created with the objective of making life better for like-minded and genuine punters to share and pick up intels. Obviously u are not one now and you are being selfish for your action.

if tat is the case, can i say u r not a genuine punter and selfish as well? seriously, does the objective being achieve over the last year?

max_priest 04-03-2016 09:22 PM

Re: Girls in 1654A
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by korean (Post 14294111)
if tat is the case, can i say u r not a genuine punter and selfish as well? seriously, does the objective being achieve over the last year?

I don't need to quantify or qualify and there is no need for me to prove myself here as I don't own anyone an explanation here ... As I have mentioned many times, those who tried and benefitted from my recommendations, good for them and enjoy! Those who thought I am writing fake FR because they didn't experience what I have experienced, regret to hear that, move on and better luck next time. There were some clowns who didn't even try the WLs whom I have recommended but claimed that my FR on these WLs are fake ... Obviously they have an axe to grind against me ...

Over the years, I am not only a punter of GL, but also HC, KTV and FL. Check my history in SBF. Henceforth, who can be more genuine than me as a punter? ... My PM buddies know me well ... ;)

korean 04-03-2016 09:29 PM

Re: Girls in 1654A
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by max_priest (Post 14294136)
I don't need to quantify and there is no need for me to proof myself here as I don't own anyone an explanation here ... As I have mentioned many times, those who tried and benefitted from my recommendations, good for them and enjoy! Those who thought I am writing fake FR because they didn't experience what I have experienced, regret to hear that, move on and better luck next time. There were some clowns who didn't even try the WLs whom I have recommended but claimed that my FR on these WLs are fake ... Obviously they have an axe to grind against me ...

you definitely not own anyone an explanation here, and I dont think I need to speak the truth for now. But I guess many seasoned cheongster should know more or less.

If u allowed me, I can prove to u here whetehr u r genuine samster here or not. I got handful of intel from WLs abt u

max_priest 04-03-2016 09:38 PM

Re: Girls in 1654A
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by korean (Post 14294152)
you definitely not own anyone an explanation here, and I dont think I need to speak the truth for now. But I guess many seasoned cheongster should know more or less.

If u allowed me, I can prove to u here whetehr u r genuine samster here or not. I got handful of intel from WLs abt u

I suggest that you set up another thread to prove me wrong or post whatever vendetta you have against me. Be my guest. Do not cloud the intent of this thread wth your nonsensical comments ... This is not the first time I read remarks like what you have posted above.

korean 04-03-2016 09:47 PM

Re: Girls in 1654A
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by max_priest (Post 14294187)
I suggest that you set up another thread to prove me wrong or post whatever vendetta you have against me. Be my guest. Do not cloud the intent of this thread wth your nonsensical comments ... This is not the first time I read remarks like what you have posted above.

i agree with u to move elsewhere to continue, but will not be immediate.

In regards to this thread, I know u have been promoting a WL all these while with 'natural' breast. Are you sure it is natural?

saabking 04-03-2016 10:58 PM

Re: Girls in 1654A
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by korean (Post 14294229)
i agree with u to move elsewhere to continue, but will not be immediate.

In regards to this thread, I know u have been promoting a WL all these while with 'natural' breast. Are you sure it is natural?

Not quite natural ley :p
Chipping in my 2 cents

korean 04-03-2016 10:59 PM

Re: Girls in 1654A
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by saabking (Post 14294468)
Not quite natural ley :p
Chipping in my 2 cents

thx for clarifying. :D

Happypudding 05-03-2016 08:04 AM

Re: Girls in 1654A
 
Also chipping in my 2cents. Max is a (mostly)fake FR writer. And i found out not by some hearsay on the internet, but by my own experience.

When I first came on SBF, I was like wow, this max guy, so many post, so much points, must be a seasoned chiongster. Lets try out his recommendations. Some hits, mostly misses. But after a few months and much money spent, I realized something is amiss. Some of his FRs are downright misleading or lies. Like he would say how good this certain's WL AR skill is. But when I went down, she don't even provide ARs. Or that she is D knockers but turn out to be Bs. Or that she allow frenching but turns out to turn away :P etcetc

Back then, I believed all those caveats that some gals have their bad days, or that some man's meat is another's poison etc etc so I didn't think too much. Things finally came to a head when I finally came across this WL whom max was aggressively promoting on this forum. We got close because of numerous RTF, and the topic of SBF (and thus max and his FRs) came up in our conversations. It turns out that max, while indeed a seasoned cheongster, is an unscrupulous one. He would frequently boast about how he is an "respected" FR writer on SBF and how he can help improved the gal's businesses simply by having him write an FR for them. He would use that to try to get raw sex from the girls in return for his "favor".

And he boast not only to the girls, but the OKTs as well. So some OKTs will get him to write good FRs about some of their not-so-popular girls to improve their businesses. So i knew then, some of his FRs are real (those whom he actually visit and let him raw), and some others are just bullshit made by him to help OKTs promote their less popular WLs. So how does he benefit from promoting for the OKTs? Cash? Discounts? I do not know. But I do know for sure the latest OKT in cahoots with him is the 1654a one :)

Those who ever tried max's recommendations will know what I am talking about. As for newbies, now you know :)

korean 05-03-2016 10:01 AM

Re: Girls in 1654A
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Happypudding (Post 14295534)
Also chipping in my 2cents. Max is a (mostly)fake FR writer. And i found out not by some hearsay on the internet, but by my own experience.

When I first came on SBF, I was like wow, this max guy, so many post, so much points, must be a seasoned chiongster. Lets try out his recommendations. Some hits, mostly misses. But after a few months and much money spent, I realized something is amiss. Some of his FRs are downright misleading or lies. Like he would say how good this certain's WL AR skill is. But when I went down, she don't even provide ARs. Or that she is D knockers but turn out to be Bs. Or that she allow frenching but turns out to turn away :P etcetc

Back then, I believed all those caveats that some gals have their bad days, or that some man's meat is another's poison etc etc so I didn't think too much. Things finally came to a head when I finally came across this WL whom max was aggressively promoting on this forum. We got close because of numerous RTF, and the topic of SBF (and thus max and his FRs) came up in our conversations. It turns out that max, while indeed a seasoned cheongster, is an unscrupulous one. He would frequently boast about how he is an "respected" FR writer on SBF and how he can help improved the gal's businesses simply by having him write an FR for them. He would use that to try to get raw sex from the girls in return for his "favor".

And he boast not only to the girls, but the OKTs as well. So some OKTs will get him to write good FRs about some of their not-so-popular girls to improve their businesses. So i knew then, some of his FRs are real (those whom he actually visit and let him raw), and some others are just bullshit made by him to help OKTs promote their less popular WLs. So how does he benefit from promoting for the OKTs? Cash? Discounts? I do not know. But I do know for sure the latest OKT in cahoots with him is the 1654a one :)

Those who ever tried max's recommendations will know what I am talking about. As for newbies, now you know :)

bro, u have basically covered a small part of what I intended to write abt and it is exactly the same experiences n opnions! omg :eek: well, I can understand why u dont dare to use ur main account to post this (sorry if I guess wrongly), but still thx u for the head start of this write up. But I suggest we move to somewhere else to continue. I think there is a few threads focusing on him.

Rawall 05-03-2016 12:07 PM

Re: Girls in 1654A
 
Up you bro 😆


Quote:

Originally Posted by Happypudding (Post 14295534)
Also chipping in my 2cents. Max is a (mostly)fake FR writer. And i found out not by some hearsay on the internet, but by my own experience.

When I first came on SBF, I was like wow, this max guy, so many post, so much points, must be a seasoned chiongster. Lets try out his recommendations. Some hits, mostly misses. But after a few months and much money spent, I realized something is amiss. Some of his FRs are downright misleading or lies. Like he would say how good this certain's WL AR skill is. But when I went down, she don't even provide ARs. Or that she is D knockers but turn out to be Bs. Or that she allow frenching but turns out to turn away :P etcetc

Back then, I believed all those caveats that some gals have their bad days, or that some man's meat is another's poison etc etc so I didn't think too much. Things finally came to a head when I finally came across this WL whom max was aggressively promoting on this forum. We got close because of numerous RTF, and the topic of SBF (and thus max and his FRs) came up in our conversations. It turns out that max, while indeed a seasoned cheongster, is an unscrupulous one. He would frequently boast about how he is an "respected" FR writer on SBF and how he can help improved the gal's businesses simply by having him write an FR for them. He would use that to try to get raw sex from the girls in return for his "favor".

And he boast not only to the girls, but the OKTs as well. So some OKTs will get him to write good FRs about some of their not-so-popular girls to improve their businesses. So i knew then, some of his FRs are real (those whom he actually visit and let him raw), and some others are just bullshit made by him to help OKTs promote their less popular WLs. So how does he benefit from promoting for the OKTs? Cash? Discounts? I do not know. But I do know for sure the latest OKT in cahoots with him is the 1654a one :)

Those who ever tried max's recommendations will know what I am talking about. As for newbies, now you know :)


saabking 05-03-2016 12:28 PM

Re: Girls in 1654A
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by korean (Post 14295852)
bro, u have basically covered a small part of what I intended to write abt and it is exactly the same experiences n opnions! omg :eek: well, I can understand why u dont dare to use ur main account to post this (sorry if I guess wrongly), but still thx u for the head start of this write up. But I suggest we move to somewhere else to continue. I think there is a few threads focusing on him.

Haha - at least my recommendations r more accurate?

korean 05-03-2016 01:56 PM

Re: Girls in 1654A
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by saabking (Post 14296281)
Haha - at least my recommendations r more accurate?

bro, for this I must give u credit. u r too humble :D

saabking 05-03-2016 02:39 PM

Re: Girls in 1654A
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by korean (Post 14296602)
bro, for this I must give u credit. u r too humble :D

Learnt my lesson - so hot to be low profile :D

unfit 05-03-2016 09:10 PM

Re: Girls in 1654A
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by korean (Post 14296602)
bro, for this I must give u credit. u r too humble :D

Mine also good right:D

Thats why i dont FR...only PM:rolleyes:

So confirm not OKT promoter liao:p

korean 05-03-2016 09:46 PM

Re: Girls in 1654A
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by unfit (Post 14297969)
Mine also good right:D

Thats why i dont FR...only PM:rolleyes:

So confirm not OKT promoter liao:p

saab recommendation is hand picked, urs recommendation is dick picked. of coz good lol u r the boss no need to do the promotor job :eek:

korean 05-03-2016 09:54 PM

Re: Girls in 1654A
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by saabking (Post 14294468)
Not quite natural ley :p
Chipping in my 2 cents

gotta learn from u to forgive and forget. at least the word is not mentioned now :rolleyes:


All times are GMT +8. The time now is 02:41 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copywrong © Samuel Leong 2006 ~ 2025